Talk:Mass/charge Ratio
Jean-Fran??????????????ois GAL?????????????? 02-28-2004 10:07 AM ET (US)
"Mass/charge ratio Add your comment on this item (m/z) ratio." Sorry to insist ... Sparkman would say "mass-to-charge ratio".
m/z is wrong
let's get rid of the m/z. It is conceptually wrong. I made a new proposal.
I moved the Suggested Definition from the front page and used the new template:
{{Sugdef|m/z|The mass/charge ratio is a physical property that is measured by mass spectrometers.
The symbol for the physical quantity mass/charge is m/q. The former m/z is based on a missconception and should no longer be used.
The SI unit of the physical quantity m/q is kilogram/coulomb (kg/C). In mass spectrometry it is more common to use the Atomic Mass Unit u and the atomic unit for charge e which is equal to the elementary charge.
This means the unit for mass/charge is:
- [m/q] = u/e
For simplicity, u is better called Dalton (Da) and e is called Millikan (Mi).
u/e is sometimes called Thomson (Th).
Therefore
- [m/q] = u/e = Da/Mi = Th
Hence, a mass spectrum x-axis should be labeled as either of the below:
- m/q (u/e)
- m/q (Da/Mi)
- m/q (Th)
(Note that this isn't my def, just my edit to put it on the Discussion page - KKM)
- -- K. Murray 15:03, 13 Jan 2005 (CST)