Sensitivity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
It is important that the relevant experimental conditions corresponding to sensitivity measurement should always be stated. These include in a typical case details of the instrument type, bombarding electron current, slit dimensions, angular collimation, gain of the multiplier detector, scan speed and whether the measured signal corresponds to a single mass peak or to the ion beam integrated over all masses. Some indication of the time involved in the determination should be given, e.g. counting time or band width. The sensitivity should be differentiated from the [[detection limit]]. | It is important that the relevant experimental conditions corresponding to sensitivity measurement should always be stated. These include in a typical case details of the instrument type, bombarding electron current, slit dimensions, angular collimation, gain of the multiplier detector, scan speed and whether the measured signal corresponds to a single mass peak or to the ion beam integrated over all masses. Some indication of the time involved in the determination should be given, e.g. counting time or band width. The sensitivity should be differentiated from the [[detection limit]]. | ||
[[Category:Data]] | |||
[[Category:General]] | |||
Revision as of 12:07, 23 January 2005
| The Sensitivity page currently does not have any content, please see |
| All terms | IUPAC 2013 | Gold Book terms | Orange Book terms | Acronyms | Deprecated terms | Obsolete terms | Draft definitions | Stub pages |
Orange Book Entry
This is the observed change in ion curent per unit mass of sample flow through the Ion Source and is measured in coulomb per microgram, C ??????????????g-1. An alternative measure of sensitivity, more suitable for gases, is the observed change in partial pressure of the sample in the Ion Source, expressed in ampere per pascal, A/Pa.
See also {Orange Book Chapter} 18.4.3.2.
Gold Book Entry
Two different measures of sensitivity are recommended. The first, which is suitable for relatively involatile materials as well as gases, depends upon the observed change in ion current for a particular amount or change of flow rate of sample though the ion source. A second method of stating sensitivity, that is most suitable for gases, depends upon the change of ion current related to the change of partial pressure of the sample in the ion source.
It is important that the relevant experimental conditions corresponding to sensitivity measurement should always be stated. These include in a typical case details of the instrument type, bombarding electron current, slit dimensions, angular collimation, gain of the multiplier detector, scan speed and whether the measured signal corresponds to a single mass peak or to the ion beam integrated over all masses. Some indication of the time involved in the determination should be given, e.g. counting time or band width. The sensitivity should be differentiated from the detection limit.
