Talk:Mass/charge Ratio: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:36, 15 January 2005

Jean-Fran??????????????ois GAL?????????????? 02-28-2004 10:07 AM ET (US)

"Mass/charge ratio Add your comment on this item (m/z) ratio." Sorry to insist ... Sparkman would say "mass-to-charge ratio".

let's get rid of the m/z. It is conceptually wrong. I made a new proposal.

I moved the Suggested Definition from the front page and used the new template:

This template is no longer used.

(Note that this isn't my def, just my edit to put it on the Discussion page - KKM)

-- K. Murray 15:03, 13 Jan 2005 (CST)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 I moved the [[Suggested Definition]] from the front page and used the new template:
-{{Sugdef|m/z|The mass/charge ratio is a physical property that is measured by [[Mass Spectrometer | mass spectrometers]].
+{{Sugdef|mass/charge|The mass/charge ratio is a physical property that is measured by [[Mass Spectrometer | mass spectrometers]].
 The symbol for the physical quantity mass/charge is ''m/q''. The former ''[[m/z]]'' is based on a [[Talk:Mass/Charge Ratio (Th, never use Da, no units?. An ion of m/z or an ion at m/z?)|missconception]] and should no longer be used.