|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| The thomson is a unit, whereas ''m/z'' is a quantity.
| |
| Therfore, the thomson would not replace ''m/z''.
| |
| Instead, the dimensionless ''m/z'' would be replaced
| |
| with ''m/q'' which has the unit '''Th'''.
| |
|
| |
|
| :''m/q'' = n '''Th'''
| |
|
| |
| where
| |
| * ''m/q'' is the symbol for a quantity of mass/charge
| |
| * n is the numerical value of the quantity ''m/q''
| |
| * '''Th''' is the symbol for the unit thomson
| |
|
| |
| ''Example:''
| |
|
| |
| * The base peak of H2O appears at 18 thomson.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| == Suggested Definition ==
| |
|
| |
| New format - suggested definitions to appear in Discussion tab:
| |
|
| |
| {| border="2" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" align="center"
| |
| |-
| |
| ! style="background:#66ff66;" | Thomson
| |
| |-
| |
| | A new [[Wikipedia:physical unit|unit]] of the [[Wikipedia:physical quantity|physical quantity]] mass/charge. The symbol ''m/q'' would then be used in place of the dimensionless [[m/z]].
| |
|
| |
| Cooks, R. G. and A. L. Rockwood (1991). "The 'Thomson'. A suggested unit for mass spectroscopists." Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 5(2): 93.
| |
|
| |
| "The Thomson (Th), a unit for mass-to-charge ratio, was proposed to alleviate problems with imprecise terminol. generated by the advent of multiply charged ion [[mass spectroscopy]]. The definition proposed for the unit is: 1Th == 1 [[amu]]/atomic charge."
| |
|
| |
| "The Thomson (Th), a unit for mass-to-charge ratio, was proposed to alleviate problems with imprecise terminol. generated by the advent of multiply charged ion [[mass spectroscopy]]. The definition proposed for the unit is: 1Th == 1 [[u]]/atomic charge."
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| | ''This is a Suggested Definition and should only appear under a discussion tab. Note that more than one suggested definition can appear in one discussion''
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| == Moved from Front Page ==
| |
|
| |
| ''' [[Mass Spec Desk Reference]] '''
| |
|
| |
| See [[Mass Spec Desk Reference]] page 27 for an argument against the adoption of this term.
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:Kkmurray|K. Murray]] 21:42, 17 Jan 2005 (CST)
| |
